How the term “mena” hurts unaccompanied migrant minors in Spain

The term “mena,” an acronym for menor extranjero no acompañado or unaccompanied foreign minor, is being increasingly used in public speeches and political rhetoric in Spain.

This has been particularly true during the recently ended election campaign. The word is often used negatively by the far right, which wants to portray these minors as foreign delinquents who should go back to their country.

Experts in immigration and children’s issues say that using this word hides the fact that these are children and teenagers who have arrived in Spain without their families, and who are living in vulnerable conditions.

Several politicians and associations have already criticized the use of the word “mena” instead of simply “minor.” Teresa Rodríguez, secretary general of the anti-austerity party Podemos in Andalusia, said on Twitter that the use of the word dehumanizes the children and teens. Her tweet included a video that has been viewed nearly one million times.

The United Nation’s children’s agency, UNICEF, also launched a campaign a few days before the elections, noting that the majority of migrant children “have committed no crimes.” And the NGO Save the Children has criticized “the rhetoric of hate and the criminalization of migrant children,” urging authorities to guarantee their safety, especially after cases of attacks against unaccompanied minors in Madrid and Zaragoza.

Although the term was originally neutral and used for years in legislation and immigration studies, “when it reaches the wider public and only the acronym is used, we are categorizing [the minors] in such a way as to seem to be talking about something other than children,” says Carmela del Moral, head of children’s policies at Save the Children.

The anthropologist Francisco Javier García Castaño, director of the Migration Institute at Granada University, compares it to the use of “illegal” to describe undocumented migrants. “There is no such thing as illegal people. Their actions, if anything, can be illegal.”

An analysis of Google searches shows that until this year, there was barely any online discussion about these unaccompanied minors, and that there was a peak in the summer, coinciding with a surge in Barcelona street crime that was attributed to some of these minors. There was another peak during the election campaign in early November.

Before the November 10 election, the acting ombudsman, Francisco Fernández Marugán, issued a statement that did not mention any political party specifically, but criticized the policy of criminalizing a community that he described as “the most vulnerable of the vulnerable.”

Rocío Monasterio, the speaker of the far-right Vox party in the Madrid regional assembly, went twice to migrant minor centers before the election, and described its occupants as “packs of menas.” One center in the Hortaleza district of Madrid suffered an attempted break-in by a group fo 30 people armed with sticks, stones and bottles. There was a similar incident in Castelldefels, in Barcelona.

Edelia Villarroya, a psychologist and director of a master’s degree in migration studies at Valencia University, says that using the term helps portray these minors as a threat, and makes it easier to appeal to emotions like fear and insecurity. “The problem posed by these minors, from a statistical viewpoint, is insignificant. The weakest link is being used as a scapegoat,” she says.

The debate over the use of the term predates the election. In July, the Interior Ministry said it was considering using a different word. The term NNAMNA was suggested (Niños, Niñas y Adolescentes Migrantes No Acompañados, or Unaccompanied Migrant Boys, Girls and Teenagers.)

Villarroya feels that a name change will not be much use, while García Castaño and Del Moral think it might help.

English version by Susana Urra.